Clothing Women: But On Other They Are Used To Highlight A Woman’s Sexuality And Emphasise Her Femininity
admin 
Speaking out against topolicy, Thorp said.
Heels play a key role in fetishising women’s bodies, and camera shots in films and magazines that focus on a woman’s legs, lips and feet all contribute to this.
High heels are a powerful symbol in our culture. In advertising and tomedia, we are continually bombarded by images of women wearing them. In popular culture women are often represented as passive objects, judged on their looks rather than their abilities. For example, look, there’s a history behind high heels that has a sexualised element to it. She’s right. Women report that they find it almost impossible to blend in and not be focus of male comments Whether a there’s more at play here than an absurd dress code policy.
Women are scrutinized much more than men for what they wear and high heels epitomise loselose nature of getting dress code right. Look, there’s a long and complicated history of women’s dress codes in workplace especially in corporate world. She pointed out that her male colleagues were not required to do so, when receptionist Nicola Thorp was ld by her employer that she had to wear high heels to work. With that said, media got hold of tostory, public outcry ensued and firm at centerof it has now changed its policy. She was sent home from her job without pay, when she refused to conform to tocompany’s dress code policy. Fact that US presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton, opts for nearly flat shoes is even deemed worthy of comment. Normally, stilettos are seen as an important symbol of power for women, a marker of high status, despite their impracticality and physical strain that they put on a woman’s body. Women in public lifetime also continue to be endlessly scrutinized for way they dress. More column inches are devoted to discussing dress codes of women political leaders than to scrutinizing sartorial choices of men in equivalent positions of power and authority.
And therefore the power dressing trend in 1980s involved business women wearing an exaggerated masculine style of dress, pinstripe suits with shoulder pads -but still paired with killer heels -as a way of signalling that their career ambition was equal to that of men. So dress for success advice books written for working women at this time recommended they wear high heels as a way of commanding attention and overcoming their height disadvantage in comparison to men, for instance when meeting a man for first time and shaking hands. Image advice she reads encourages a somewhat mannish appearance but if you go consultant tells her that her appearance is will eventually subside, so later realised that it had morphed into a judgement of who she was as a person, in early stages of her political leadership she ignored negative coverage of her image. News reports focused on her choice of clothes; and a situation when she tripped over in India was reported framebyframe in a front page spread of a leading Australian newspaper, Cameras were trained on her bottom.
On one hand, high heels are suggested as a way for a woman to gain height and look more like a man.
Wearing high heels at work is a game women can not win Whether not,, or they form part of a dress code.
Finding a balance between these competing expectations is impossible, so this article was originally published on The Conversation. Read original article. They must show that they can manage their bodies at work the way that is culturally acceptable, in order to Besides, result is that women’s bodies at work are implicitly seen as different and abnormal, inherently sexual, suspicious and disruptive. Over a couple of decades, researchers have shown that workplace norms surrounding body are implicitly masculine. Now pay attention please. Women learn from an early age to discipline their bodies through diet, exercise, clothes, make up and shoes. Although, as Thorp found out, power of high heels at work isn’t confined to media celebrities and politicians.
