It’s Our Cover Loose Luxury – Clothes Aren’T For Men Or Women Anymore They’Re For People
admin 
Which has probably been a reason why so the majority of these designers chafe at term unisex or postgender.
Same with Baja East, that designers John Targon and Scott Studenberg started after hearing so lots of their female chums inquire about their clothing. We’re rebelling against the tailored shirt and the designer dress, says Targon of their fluid silk trenches and voluminous cashmeres. It requires on the attitude of who’s wearing it, says Targon. Normally, it’s made for you. On top of that, it’s our get loose luxury. Unlike, say, Pierre Cardin or Rudi Gernreich whose experiments with unisex dressing in 1960s and ’70s had a radical, national edge designers such as Targon and Studenberg and Hood by Air’s Shayne Oliver are merely creating clothes that fit the increasingly lifestyles diverse people who wear them. The gender neutral garment usually can virtually improve the wearer’s individuality, while not making everyone look really similar.
Anderson, unlike Hourani or Targon and Studenberg, has separate menswear and womenswear lines, yet a splatter painted tunic from one line could quickly end up in the next. It’s exciting to see how a ruffle moves on a male body. Just as women have taken up oxfords and flat shoes, men always were likewise incorporating previously female garments into their wardrobe. It’s a well his clothes, for men and women, play with usually idea feminine details, such as ruffles, juxtaposed with tough fabrics like leather or suede. These sources of tension exploring unusual forms on unusual body shapes make fashion, Katherine Bernard, a writer for Vogue. Or Marc Jacobs, who for an ideal year was hardly seen in something apart from a Comme des Garcons kilt; or
