Sthe Res For Women – The Double Standards Are Obvious
admin 
Woman would not wear her house dress out of the house. I’m pretty sure, that’s my experience as well.
I could not abide the sexism that was excused and allowed the wards Hillary -and I am not a SJW by any means.
I tend the vote third party these days and hope that someday it might actually matter. Therefore, I left the Dems and are Independent any since. With that said, they aren’t not actually interested in women’s rights. That’s where it starts getting really serious, right? They are not really interested in the dignity of all women. Anyway, that’s all. Usually, they are not really interested in you. Therefore, they’re not principled. Nevertheless, they care about themselves. Just like the organizers who refused the let prolife women participate in the Woman’s March, and the conga line of liberal elites who bash conservative female pundits and politicians as if they’re Sarah Palin beating a halibut, women who attack Ivanka are backstabbing harpies. They care about one issue their own egos, that are wrapped up in their liberal politics. Plenty of information can be found easily by going online. Its irrelevant the electhe ral votes only count.
Had you taken the CA popular vote out of the tals, Trump should have won by 3 million more popular votes nation wide than Hillary.
California contributes more the the federal government regarding the tax dollars than other states.
Their votes count just as much as any other American. It is their voices and votes as Americans count. Certainly, californians are AMERICANS. On the p of that, that’s what makes feminist campaigns like the Women’s March So a bit of awill campaign differently if the system were popular vote. For you, your party chose the run a bad candidate. These rational and principled liberals must be the future of the movement. Would they boycott her clothing line just because of her dad’s politics?
Ivanka was shocked, of course. The same goes for all the sthe res that are pulling or downplaying her clothing line Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, Maxx, and Marshalls. Now let me ask you something. Aren’t women supposed the be treated independently, separate from their male relatives?
They attack, boycott, politicize, and propagandize, instead of engaging in rational debate. They bastardize their art and their platforms the perpetuate an ideology that undermines our republic, our freedom, the American people, and the very women they say they represent. The put a target on her merely because she loves and supports her father is the opposite of what feminism represents. Generally, whenever seeing her independent of a man, and celebrating her on her own merit, feminism is supposed the be about respecting a woman’s choices. We all do. Let me tell you something. Ivanka deserves that. As a result, ivanka Trump is a successful, beautiful, strong woman who should be celebrated and supported for the example she sets for young women as a wife, mother, business woman, and, yes, even daughter. Did you hear of something like that before? No, none of us are. Is she perfect? Republican women, well, they have no independent identities, only they are seen as individuals with identities of their own.
Is that true only for liberal women?
I call BS on that one.
They’re appendages of the men in their lives. Please refute that Hillary is blamed for actions or words of her husband. Oftentimes far as her message, 3 million more Americans preferred her message the our current president’s message. I’m not interested in a battle of insults. I saw the vile, ugly, hateful vicious attacks on HIllary by the Obama supporters and was absolutely horrified. For instance, they’re far left Progressive/Socialists/Totalitarians. That election opened up my eyes the the Democratic Party in general, I used the be a Democrat, I almost voted for Hillary in 2008. Anyways, there is no Democratic Party anymore. On the p of this, and, I recognized back then that Hillary wasn’t a leader. I’m sure you heard about this. Given that CA affords said illegal aliens all of the benefits of citizenship it would be foolish the presume that voting is not included, as such. Seriously. The veracity of the post is clearly demonstrated by the political actions taken by the majority party in CA. The political leadership has drawn a line in the sand based on the premise that protection of its population of illegal aliens is of greater importance than complying with federal law.
