Mar
30
Comments Off on Womens Clothes: To(Likely) Simple/Innocent Explanation

Womens Clothes: To(Likely) Simple/Innocent Explanation

Author admin    Category womens clothes     Tags

womens clothes Whenever showing your bits and bobs and bulges ain’t appropriate, whether you’re ten or one hundred.

Since they have been only ten…, for those of you saying Well, it’s okay.

You are part of the serious poser. On p of that, whether you’re male or female. Actually, you likely gave birth to the poser. Also, that’s logic behind torule. Normally, intent surely is that flying is a privilege for employees and their family, and they must have a nice appearance. I don’t know. One could certainly argue that clothing guidelines for non revs are a bit outdated. I would like to ask you a question. Is that still necessary nowadays?

Basically the most logical explanation is girls were ‘nonrevs’.

Obviously, plenty of women fly in leggings/yoga pants all along without any issue whatsoever.

Having one agent all of a sudden impose her own interpretation of dress code seems really unlikely. So if they let it slide they would likely be in hot water for not doing their job. Please mind your business and let underpaid and overworked airline agent do their job. You know less than nothing and it’s not your place to comment on an employee doing best in order to enforce rules their employer dictates. For those of you ready and willing to tell United agent what their job is and ain’t. Certainly, no, you aren’t really o much into that, now do you?

womens clothes You’d rather turn it into some sort of social injustice situation. No. Please, please, grow up, get on with your life, take responsibility for your actions, and learn to stop playing tovictim. For those of you ready to jump on racist bandwagon without even knowing todetails. Essentially, plus all this very negative exposure bestowed on toairline. Reason. Needless to say, is it right? Wish a follow up will be posted as, can almost guarantee employee was fired because of great friends or family that didn’t follow torules. Rules are rules, Don’t know. Of course ben Schlappig is a travel consultant, blogger, and avid points collector. Basically, he chronicles his adventures, with industry news, here at One Mile At A Time. He travels about 400000 miles a year, primarily using miles and points to fund his first class experiences.

womens clothes And therefore the original tweet to highlight what happened came from Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action. I wonder if she sees irony in someone whose own organization uses gender stereotyping front and center so complaining about perceived sexism. Mues. Disagree entire dress code is specifically designed to regulate women’s bodies. Make sure you drop suggestions about it. We all know they don’ Pull up your pants is mostly about extent of it, you van argue that tofootwear. Ripped clothing might also apply to men. I see it as a privilege and I look for to be properly dressed, be it only out of respect of my colleagues on board and fellow passengers. I usually can’t go wrong, besides that, I’m almost sure I am usually traveling in a business casual attire. Being a non rev myself, To be honest I always look up specific rules of airline I’m planning to fly on -especially in premium cabin. It ain’t that difficult. We also think hysteria surrounding this incident isstunning, and perpetuation of a false narrative is problematic and needs to stop.

womens clothes People dress to sloppily when flying.

I’m tired of seeing outlines of women’s vaginas when they wear leggings.

It’s not about size….it’s not appropriate whether you’re a size 2 or BTW, men….no more tank ps! Anyways, have a little of pride in your look. There’s a difference between being comfortable and being a slob. Spokesman spoke out of both sides of his mouth on this matter. Remember, jonathan Guerin says that If you are a customer and need to wear your yoga pants, welcome aboard. So said. I have female friends who are FAs and I’ve seen them board wearing leggings but they looked like skinny jeans and not spandex gym wear. Of course, one can argue that dress code is outdated but it’s not a secret to those who fly on passes. There’s a big difference. On p of this, they showed up wearing Y and were ld to change. Notice that they are ld that if you accept pass for free travel you shan’t wear X, Y, or Z as you are representing toairline’s brand. So that’s pretty straightforward. Then again, pass travelers accept free/discounted tickets in exchange for a specific code of conduct and dress code.

Actually I really hope your other articles are a bit better researched, intention to toauthor.

Second, They were on passes so not rev passengers.

Lastly, let me repeat they have been 10 year olds. Of all they have been 10 year olds. Although, leggings are business attire for 10 year olds as their business is children, as Patricia Arquette so beautifully put it. The huge problem we have got how United handled situation on Twitter, that is now causing media outlets to write stories about it with headlines like United Airlines Won’t Let ’10YearOld’ Girl in Leggings on Flight Defends Decision on Social Media. Anyway, we’ve rounded up all designers who have spoken out on totopic below. Generally, like Joseph Altuzarra, chose to remain neutral about their political leanings, others like Marc Jacobs and Tommy Hilfiger were outspoken in how they felt about dressing new FLOTUS, while some.

In time following Theallet’s letter, fashion designers have spoken up about prospect of dressing future Lady. Whenever objectifying them as if their presentation is display for purposes of exciting or entertaining YOU rather than expressions of their own personality, desires, or comfort, code is specifically geared to ensuring that women are denied their bodies or their sexuality. Not nearly any airline to still, these rules don’t exist just for fun. Usually, it will be argued what exactly is deemed appropriate and to what extent rules have to be specific, yet in this case it was apparently clearly stated. Besides, even if they are being allowed to ride FREE, after all why should they expect anybody to conform to dress code rules of company when they don’t actually work for tocompany. Give up your freedom to dress way you need for FREE AIRLINE tickets. As a result, what’s United thinking? Oftentimes maybe top-notch thing to do will be to STOP their policy of allowing people to ride for FREE. Dress code for people who don’t actually work for United but are given a free ride?

United, either make these flyers wear a button that says I REPRESENT UNITED or drop additional restrictions. It’s inappropriate for ALL passengers, if your company feels that certain clothing is inappropriate. Actually I was explicitly and expressly informed, and so it is quoted from email itself, Your ticket is issued positive space business travel we ask that when traveling you dress in business attire, when I flew on spacepositive status with United. Humiliating a couple of kids for using your stupid passes is unacceptable. Girls are not employees. You see, that’s ridiculous. I am not flying United anymore. You should take it into account. If that is your policy so change it and adapt to a discrimination free era. Eventually, those are not free passes, someone actually worked to earn them.

United really dropped ball on Twitter with this situation.

They reference contract of carriage, and say they have right to refuse passengers for their dress, including passengers who are barefoot or not properly clothed, when asked about their clothing policy.

Given exactly how many people wear spandex, I have no reason to believe that’s tocase. Without a non rev. Actually, before even reading details of post that was what my exact assumption as well for clothing rule. Then, for someone to say loads of us know that there are virtually no seats avail as it’s spring break probably doesn’t fly NR… yes look, there’re less options but many flights have wide open availability.

Those flying non rev absolutely know torules. United should have investigated before jumping gun in this one before providing a better response. Policy is antiquated for nonrevs. Ten years ago Delta liberalized its nonrev policy. Nonetheless, jeans are acceptable, we’re talking about casual pants for women. United gives nonrevs in business class pajamas on 12+ hour flights. For instance, having any special rules applying to their clothing is ridiculous, if answer is no. Is there any way to distinguish them from a regular paid passenger just by looking at them, when a person flies NRSA. Therefore if I can’t distinguish them from any other passenger, hereafter why have any additional clothing restrictions really, United’s contention is that these NRSA flyers represent toairline. Fashion functions as a reflection of times that we live in, that is why it should come as no surprise that sartorial choices can be extremely political. Work, or church, surely we can fly without flip flops, shorts, yoga pants, beer tshirts, and pajamas, Therefore if we can dress up for a nice dinner.

All airlines must impose stricter dress codes on all passengers.

It is patently untrue.

Yes, UA employee should have known, or if in doubt, they must have asked for clarification, So if these children were indeed NRSA pass riders. I am in Employee Relations for a major regional supporting a couple of mainline carriers, and we investigate all manner of NRSA violations ain’t saving Alitalia from another impending bankruptcy now, is it, while I agree with United’s stance here given topassengers’ status as nonrev. Weird how there’re all references to Italy in comments section. I’m sick of men wearing their pants at their knee showing off their underwear.

Dylan is right.

I sent winter in Italy they dress to nines and look dignified and respectful.

Will never happen to a male ‘nonrev’ passenger, I’ll have you know that as a male, man mentioned in this story was a paying passenger so what he was wearing is not at all relevant, and wearing shorts, that had he been on a staff ticket would still look for stuff free and dictate rules to get free stuff clearly need more structure.

I’ve seen many a young girl in public wearing leggings without anything covering their privates, That’s a fact, it’s tally inappropriate and my daughter should never be out in public like that. For example, reporter does say that it was unclear if gate agent issued they’ve been nonrevs. Only a jerk or an idiot should say they’re not flying united anymore jack as if anyone cares. They have been free passes employees are paid in cash not tickets wake up and smell tocoffee. Known more businesses must follow United’s lead and not cave into Twitter bullying and busy bodies. Business under fire bends over backwards to make apologies when one ain’t necessary out of fear of losing customers. I’d also like to know how she got back to Denver. I’d like to know if woman who tweeted about this incident rebooked on another airline or got on toplane. More significantly is that an even smaller percentage will actually change their buying habits nearly any re tweet. Companies need to start pushing back when people spread stories that are not true or missing facts.

Simple fact is that only a small percentage of Americans use Twitter.

I read she lives in Denver, that is a United hub.

Doubtful. All any time she goes somewhere? Did she cancel her return ticket? It’s a well we have become a nation of wildly unattractive slobs. It’s only a matter of time before Americans don’t bother to wear clothes whatsoever when they go out. Whenever tweeting woman must have minded her own percent## business. It is I am thrilled that United held firm to their non revenue passenger dress code. Never is this more apparent than when we get on a plane.

They must indeed.

If you’re an employee So in case you’re an employee and give buddy passes to friends or family, if they misbehave while traveling with your benefits. So in case you’re family of an employee. While she witnessed situation unfoldfor a flight from Denver to Minneapolis, Twitter user was flying from Denver to Mexico City. Furthermore, definitely it’s possible that gate agent was incorrectly applying standards to revenue passengers, though I see no reason to assume that.When there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for something, there’s no reason to assume foul play.

Whenever should affect fashion world, especially after majority of toindustry’s power players had donated to Clinton’s campaign.

In this Era of trump people if family was registered republican they won’t understand what I’m writing about. It all boils down to normal human decency and respect for others. Therefore, I couldn’t care less what anyone wears.

We should at least have right to wear comfortable clothes for 6+ hour flights in miserably cramped quarters beside smug, often smelly and unwashed fellow passengers with grumpy flight attendants.

Most airlines have transformed flying from something that used to be cool into a nightmare.

About dressing up for a flight? Get a grip. I just wish people were in a better habit of bathing before a flight. In this case, sponsoring employee is almost certainly getting disciplined/fired for a straightforward policy violation. Real shame is that most gate agents wouldn’t file any kind of complaint on a nonrev who quietly remedied their mistake. Have you heard of something like that before? I think it looks ridiculous to dress like you’re gate agents should have been more discreet and toPR/social media staff must have gotten all info on this situation before jumping togun. Terrible job by United. I usually wear legging on flights over three hours but always with a sweater that covers rear and a scarf to dress it up a bit.

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

Categories